Нацистская политика уничтожения
Злодеяния.
Возмездие.
Память.
Нюрнбергский процесс
Последующие Нюрнбергские процессы
Советские процессы
Европейские процессы
Азиатские процессы
1ДЕНЬ 10
3ДЕНЬ 11
4ДЕНЬ 12
5ДЕНЬ 13
6ДЕНЬ 14
7ДЕНЬ 15
10ДЕНЬ 16
11ДЕНЬ 17
12ДЕНЬ 18
13ДЕНЬ 19
14ДЕНЬ 20
17ДЕНЬ 21
18ДЕНЬ 22
19ДЕНЬ 23
20ДЕНЬ 24
РУС
ENG
FRA
DEU
SYN
14 1945.
Day 20.
Morning session
Defender Dr. Kauffmann (Kaltenbrunner) objects to Pfaffenberger Affidavit regarding Koch
US Prosecution replies (US Chief Prosecutor R. H. Jackson)
Interpretation by the Tribunal (President J. Lawrence) of the statute regarding affidavits. Consent of the USSR (Chief Prosecutor from the USSR R. A. Rudenko), Great Britain (Chief Adviser to the Chief Prosecutor from Great Britain J. Roberts) and France (Faure) with the US prosecution (Chief Prosecutor from the United States Justice R. H. Jackson)
The defense (Bergold, Bormann's defense attorney) argues that Koch's accusations in Pfafenberger's affidavit “contradict German procedure, since the prosecution presents only incriminating evidence (Article 160 of the Reich Code of Penal Procedure)
Defense (Kubushok, von Papen's defender) speaks on affidavits
US Prosecution (US Chief Prosecutor R.H. Jackson) Uses Pfafenberger's Affidavit
US Assistant Chief Prosecutor W. Walsh presents T: The Persecution of the Jews. — Continued from December 13, 1945 — Full statement : 13.12.1945—14.12.1945
Afternoon session
The defense (Kauffmann, defense counsel for Kaltenbrunner) objects to the affidavit of Wilhelm Hoettl; motion denied
US Assistant Chief Prosecutor W. Walsh presents T: The Persecution of the Jews. — Continued from December 13, 1945 — Full statement : 13.12.1945—14.12.1945
US Assistant Chief Prosecutor Capt. S. Harris presents Document Book “U”: “Germanization and Spoliation” — : 14.12.1945—17.12.1945
US Prosecution (US Chief Prosecutor R.H. Jackson) presents evidence against organizations
Defense (Boehm, SA defender) on the provision of documents in German language